International Judicial Activism and the Commodity-Form Theory of International Law

Bibliographic Data

ID12198736
AuthorsSusan Marks (University of Cambridge, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume18
Issue1
Pages199-211
Publication date2007-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0938-5428 • E-ISSN: 1464-3596
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ejil/chm002
OpenAlexW2123426337
LanguageEN
Citations received8

In his book Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law, China Miéville revisits the work of 1920s Russian jurist E. B. Pashukanis to develop a 'commodity-form' theory of international law. The theory serves as a valuable and instructive counterpoint to influential currents in international legal scholarship. However, this essay argues that Miéville is unnecessarily negative about the prospects for international law to contribute to progressive change. Central to his thesis is the critical insight that international law is indeterminate. He maintains that 'for every claim there is a counter-claim and "legalistic" [anti-imperialism] is therefore ultimately toothless'. By contrast, this essay contends that indeterminacy and its antipode, determinacy, are not properties of international law. Rather, they are arguments, the emancipatory force of which is not fixed, but context-dependent

Commodity · Comparative law · Context (archaeology · Counterpoint · Determinacy · Economics · Epistemology · Expansionism · Indeterminacy (philosophy · International law · Law and economics · Marxist philosophy · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · International Law and Human Rights · History · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access