The first annually resolved analysis of slash-and-burn practices in the boreal Eurasia suggests their strong climatic and socio-economic controls

Bibliographic Data

ID12200945
AuthorsIgor Drobyshev (0000-0002-5980-4316, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, corresponding author), Alexei Aleinikov (0000-0002-5715-8488, Centre for Forest Ecology and Productivity), Olga Lisitsyna (0000-0003-1415-7650, Tallinn University of Technology), Vadim E Aleksutin (0009-0007-1870-4363, Centre for Forest Ecology and Productivity), Vadim Aleksutin, Foma K Vozmitel (0000-0002-6913-4811, Bauman Moscow State Technical University), Foma Vozmitel, Nina Ryzhkova (0000-0002-5017-8064, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue)
Year2023
Volume33
Issue2
Pages301-312
Publication date2023-08-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVegetation History and Archaeobotany (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0939-6314 • E-ISSN: 1617-6278
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s00334-023-00939-9
OpenAlexW4385552950
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited29

Slash-and-burn (SAB) was a widespread agricultural practice across large parts of the boreal region until the early 20th century. Despite its paramount importance in the procurement of food and particularly in supporting frontier populations of settlers during the colonization of the Eurasian boreal zone, analyses of spatial and temporal patterns in the use of SAB at annual and sub-annual scales are currently missing. We present the first such analysis of climatic and social controls of SAB practices in a remote region in the northern Ural mountains from 1880 to 1894. We observed a significant positive correlation between the total number of burns and the village population ( p = 0.005, R 2 = 0.26), indicating that the frequency of burns directly reflected the local demand for food. The amount of agricultural land, regarded as a cumulative measure of burning activity over multiple decades, showed a strong positive correlation with the village population ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.60). This result supported our interpretation of burns as an important food procurement tool, probably also positively affected by higher labour availability in larger villages. Villages where the number of burns were higher than predicted by the “the population vs. burns” regression tended ( p = 0.15) to have larger areas of arable land than predicted by the “population vs. arable land” regression. This pattern implied that variability in the local environmental and/or socio-economic settings of the villages made some of them more (or otherwise less) favourable for agricultural activities based on SAB. Most reported burns occurred in June and July. The three years with the maximum number of reported burns had a tendency to be wetter during these months when compared to the same period during an “average” year ( p = 0.19). The pattern suggested that farmers preferred conducting burns during years with a below-average climatological fire hazard. An earlier start of the fire season favoured burning activity ( p = 0.10 R 2 = 0.33), while its later ending had no significant effect on the number of burns ( p = 0.53). Our study documented strong climatic controls of SAB practices at the annual scale and their social controls at above-annual scales. These patterns emerged despite the common use of slash-and-burn to mitigate generally limited food availability in the northern Ural mountain region and likely conservative estimates of these practices in available records

Agriculture · Arable land · Archaeology · Biology · Boreal · Geography · Physical geography · Population · Slash-and-burn · Socioeconomics · Agriculture and Farm Safety · Demography · Fire effects on ecosystems · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Ecology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access