U.S. Government Burdens on the Exercise of Traditional Religions
Two Cases Provide Conflicting Interpretations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12201352 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas F King (Oldham Council, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 393-396 |
| Publication date | 2011-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0940739111000269 |
| OpenAlex | W2110781290 |
| Language | EN |
Two court decisions highlight divergent opinions as to what constitutes a “substantial burden” on the practice of traditional indigenous religions in the United States. One decision, in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, effectively defines the term in such a way as to discriminate against indigenous religious practices; the other, by a district court in the 10th Circuit based on other holdings by that circuit court, gives much more latitude for protecting such practices and the landscapes they often involve
Court decision · Government (linguistics · Indigenous · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Mormonism, Religion, and History · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions
| Highly cited | No |
|---|