Response to Patrick Hart
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12201882 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Suzanne Owen (0000-0003-4774-6208, Leeds Trinity UniversityLeeds, ls18 5hdUnited Kingdom, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-34 |
| Publication date | 2015-09-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0943-3058 • E-ISSN: 1570-0682 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15700682-12341347 |
| OpenAlex | W617839242 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
This paper is a response to Patrick Hart’s article ‘Theory, method, and madness in religious studies’ and further interrogates the terms “theory” and “method,” the relationship between them, and their application to the study of religion, particularly at a pedagogical level, where there is some confusion about what is referred to by these terms. This paper argues that theory and method should be included explicitly in religious studies programs and research to show how scholarship has been produced
Confusion · Epistemology · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Scholarship · Sociology · Law · Mormonism, Religion, and History · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Study and Philosophy of Religion
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |