Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Religion as a Social Kind

Reflections on Stanley Stowers’s New Realist Theory and the Study of Ancient Mediterranean Religion

Bibliographic Data

ID12201893
AuthorsMichael Stausberg (0000-0002-2011-6997, Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen https://dx.doi.org/1658 Bergen Norway, corresponding author), Laura Feldt (0000-0002-7264-2542, Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen https://dx.doi.org/1658 Bergen Norway), Christian H Bull (0000-0003-0054-8052, University of Bergen), Christian Büll (0000-0001-7785-2920, Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen https://dx.doi.org/1658 Bergen Norway), Ingvild Sælid Gilhus (0000-0001-9981-4765, Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen https://dx.doi.org/1658 Bergen Norway), Alexander Van Der Haven (0000-0001-6195-0083, Department of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen https://dx.doi.org/1658 Bergen Norway)
Year2025
Volume38
Issue2
Pages162-191
Publication date2025-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMethod & Theory in the Study of Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0943-3058 • E-ISSN: 1570-0682
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15700682-bja10164
OpenAlexW4416975380
LanguageEN

This essay critically discusses Stanley Stowers’s History and the Study of Religion (2024) as a bold criticism of antirealist and constructivist approaches and therefore a contribution to a realist turn in the study of religions. It interrogates the validity of its theoretical cornerstone of “religion as a social kind” and its distinction of religious “subkinds”. Moreover, the essay highlights the methodological strengths of Stowers’s critique of Christian origins narratives and his emphasis on non-elite religious practices, yet questions the payoff of the “social kind” framework relative to recent scholarship in the field. With the help of comparative perspectives from Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Judaean traditions, the essay assesses the broader applicability of Stowers’s theory and proposes additional perspectives. Ultimately, while recognizing its contributions, the essay calls for further conceptual clarification and integration with wider theoretical and historical debates

Cornerstone · Criticism · Metatheory · Narrative · Scholarship · Social constructivism · Globalization, Historical Perspectives, and International Relations · Islamic Studies and History · Study and Philosophy of Religion

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae