Conceptualizing Religion
Responses
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12202367 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Benson Saler (1Brandeis University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2000 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Número | 1-4 |
| Páginas | 323-338 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2000-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0943-3058 • E-ISSN: 1570-0682 |
| Editorial | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/157006800x00238 |
| OpenAlex | W1964538794 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 8 |
I am very grateful to the commentators for the time and effort that they expended on my book. I do not imagine that it was easy to read. For over and beyond any unclarities generated by my prose, the perspective on categories celebrated in Conceptualizing Religion constitutes a departure from what most of us, from childhood on, have learned to accept as workable and conventional (if not actually mandated by a rational accommodation to the order of the world). To the extent that a certain disparity in viewpoints distances me from some of my readers, it imposes difficulties in following my argument. I appreciate the fact that the commentators have taken the book seriously enough to engage it. I respond to each of the commentators below, in alphabetical order
Accommodation · Aesthetics · Argument (complex analysis · Art · Economics · Epistemology · Order (exchange · Perspective (graphical · Sociology · Viewpoints · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Study and Philosophy of Religion
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,17 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2014 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |