A Response to Stephen L. Young, “Let’s Take the Text Seriously”
The Protectionist Doxa in Mainstream New Testament Studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12202637 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guillaume Dye (0000-0001-9005-6339, Faculté de Philosophie et Sciences sociales, Université libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 4-5 |
| Pages | 380-385 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0943-3058 • E-ISSN: 1570-0682 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15700682-12341481 |
| OpenAlex | W3030171506 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
This response to Stephen Young’s excellent paper vindicates his general argument against protectionism, connects his analyses to some aspects of contemporary Qurʾanic and Early Islamic studies, and highlights some of the problems with the distinction between dominant protectionism and dominated protectionism
Argument (complex analysis · Economics · Epistemology · International trade · Mainstream · Protectionism · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Chemistry · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |