Past and Present in Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12204052 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Allen Reddick (University of Zurich, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 207-222 |
| Publication date | 2010-02-26 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Lexicography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0950-3846 • E-ISSN: 1477-4577 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ijl/ecq005 |
| OpenAlex | W2022413238 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
Johnson’s method of incorporating illustrative quotations from previous authors into his Dictionary creates a ‘space of pastness,’ in which some decontextualized authors can be used by Johnson to argue or represent views in the present. The illustrations quoted in the Dictionary are de-historicized; indeed the Dictionary itself is not concerned with a history of language or diachronic development. Yet one must be cautious in assessing and using evidence from the quotations. In the case of John Milton, Johnson adjusts and re-places Milton’s ideological symbolic value, quoting him in rhetorically, usually self-reflexive ways, and reads him, in part, through the eyes and works of Alexander Pope. Finally, it has been shown that in the Preface to the Dictionary, Johnson thematizes the elusiveness of the present and its tragic overtones of regret, failure, and death. The Preface is preoccupied with time and time’s passing
English language · Lexicography · Library science · Linguistics · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Classics · History · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |