Clarifying Some Unsettled Questions Surrounding Shuōwén jiězì

Bibliographic Data

ID12205221
AuthorsMelissa Xiaohui Qin (0000-0003-1868-5936, University of Science and Technology Beijing, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume39
Publication date2025-11-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Lexicography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0950-3846 • E-ISSN: 1477-4577
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ijl/ecaf028
OpenAlexW4416775339
LanguageEN
References cited12

The study examines three sources of cross-cultural challenges when studying classic works of indigenous languages within the general framework of modern linguistics: primary texts, translation and terminology. Specifically, it has revealed and clarified three sets of unsettled questions in the English-language scholarship of Shuōwén jiězì, the masterpiece of classical Chinese lexicography: What are the start and completion dates of Shuōwén jiězì (the historical question)? How to translate the title of Shuōwén jiězì (the translation question)? Is Shuōwén jiězì an etymological dictionary (the epistemological question)? Through mixed methods of meticulous coding and statistical calculation, the study has shown notable divergent (and conflicting) patterns regarding the chronology of Shuōwén, its title translation and the conceptualization of “etymology”. Probing into these unsettled issues not only clarifies prevailing misunderstandings in the extant scholarship, but also problematizes the current state of indigenous language studies by external scholars (of distant language backgrounds) within the general linguistic framework built mainly on the materials of Indo-European languages

Conceptualization · Extant taxon · Indigenous · Scholarship · Translation studies · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Cultural Studies · Linguistics and language evolution

Tools

Open DOI