Accountability from Somewhere and for Someone
Relating with Care
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12206256 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sonja Jerak-Zuiderent (0000-0003-2804-1763, Linköping University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Volumen | 24 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 412-435 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-07-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Science as Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0950-5431 • E-ISSN: 1470-1189 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09505431.2015.1050368 |
| OpenAlex | W2170695899 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 21 |
| Referencias citadas | 21 |
In contemporary care institutions, accountability procedures and devices are increasingly pervasive and considered crucial for monitoring quality. Such accountability practices are based on the idea that accountability and care belong in two separate domains. The distinction between accountability ‘from nowhere and for everyone’ and accountability ‘from somewhere and for someone’ problematises this implicit split. Taking seriously the observations of everyday caring and accounting by care professionals, who resist splitting care and accountability from the outset, demands a reconceptualisation of the relation between care and accountability as reciprocal and co-emerging. Both accountability and care are highly circumstantial, emerging, relational notions and it is not clear-cut who or what cares or accounts for what, whom, where and how. Paying due attention to the generative interweaving of accounting and caring, that is, to the narrative work of care professionals, affords the potential to turn universal abstract norms of what good care should be into meaningful care. Creatively reconnecting care experiences, observations, records and relations generates accountability with care. Care professionals do this by daring to prioritise speculatively what matters most in a specific situation without falling back on the reassurance of clear-cut norms of good care and by daring to admit that even while prioritising a certain course of action, they might not know its consequences. Such a speculative commitment and the inclusion of the researcher's experiences in trying to be accountable are crucial for studying accountability as a matter of care and as relatedness in the making
Accountability · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Psychology
Collaborative Ethnography and Matters of Care in Counterspaces
Introduction
Cultivating quality awareness in corona times
Measuring or meaning? Insights into quality of mental healthcare from patient and therapist stories
Communicating Care
Algorithmic accountabilities and health systems
Care in Translation
Travelling meanings
Datafication and accountability in public health
Following the algorithm
Courtesy work
Data as promise
Frying eggs or making a treatment plan? Frictions between different modes of caring in a community mental health team
Bedtime negotiations
The infrastructure of telecare
The Emergence of (Male) Eating Disorders as a Clinical Entity
O pensamento disruptivo do cuidado
Environmental Care
Care
The day program multiple
Between orchestrated and organic
Women, Work and Computerization
The Logic of Care
Studies in ethnomethodology
Narration or Science? Collapsing the Division in Organization Studies
Working Out What Garfinkel Could Possibly be Doing with “Durkheim’s Aphorism”
Social Organization of Medical Work
Audit Cultures
Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice
Matters of care in technoscience
Accounting and Washing
A Game of Cat's Cradle
Proving or Improving
Defensive work in nursing homes
On the Art of Life
Nothing Comes Without Its World
The Body Multiple
Situated Knowledges
Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions
| Obras citantes distintas | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 20 |