The varieties of financial statecraft and middle powers
Assessing South Korea’s strategic involvement in regional financial cooperation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12207351 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yaechan Lee (0000-0003-0379-5745, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University), William W Grimes (0000-0001-9748-6147, Boston University, corresponding author), William N Kring (0000-0002-6574-4524, Global Development Policy Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 913-939 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Pacific Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-2748 • E-ISSN: 1470-1332 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09512748.2023.2281687 |
| OpenAlex | W4389918175 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 59 |
In recent years, the financial statecraft literature has expanded from a focus on great powers to encompass the behavior of emerging powers. While offering an important corrective, the literature does not yet adequately address the full variety of the emerging powers’ strategies of financial statecraft. In particular, we argue that regional middle powers behave differently from regional great powers even when they have similar capacities at the global level. For instance, both India and South Korea are categorized as emerging powers in the financial statecraft literature and deploy regional strategies to reduce their financial vulnerability. Yet their financial statecraft strategies have clearly differed in practice. India has sought to challenge the global status quo and influence its neighbors, while South Korea has pursued more modest and defensive goals. Drawing on the middle power literature, we posit that middle powers’ relative position within their home regions explains such differences among the financial statecraft of emerging powers. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, we examine South Korea’s financial statecraft in the Asia-Pacific region. We find that its position as a regional middle power effectively explains its patterns of bilateral and regional cooperation in the monetary sphere
Business · Financial system · Strategic financial management · Strategic planning · Asian Industrial and Economic Development · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Finance · Marketing
National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade
The middle power
Niche Diplomacy
Middle Powers and the Rise of China
The “Middle Power” Concept in Australian Foreign Policy
Rethinking Korea's Middle Power Diplomacy as a Nation Branding Project
The changing architecture of politics in the Asia-Pacific
Regional security strategies of middle powers in the Asia-Pacific
Monetary Power and Monetary Statecraft
Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions
Theorizing the Financial Statecraft of Emerging Powers
The International Politics of Reactive Currency Statecraft
From Financial Assets to Financial Statecraft
Middle power strategic choices and horizontal security cooperation
Middle-power definitions
Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions
Political economy in security studies after the cold war
East Asia and the politics of global finance
South Korea's elusive middlepowermanship
Economic statecraft, geoeconomics and regional political economies
Middle power identities of Australia and South Korea
Chinese financial statecraft in Southeast Asia
South Korea under the United States–China rivalry
Riding the tide
Redistribution and recognition
How to compare regional powers
Weaponized Interdependence
Power and interdependence
New Trends in Canadian Foreign Policy
The BRICS and collective financial statecraft
Financial Statecraft
Financialization and its discontents
Identity, Power, and Threat Perception
The Limits of Collective Financial Statecraft
This Time It’s Real
The concept of a middle power in international relations
Global Korea
East Asian financial regionalism
South Korea's middle power diplomacy
The Varieties of Collective Financial Statecraft
Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power
The (Ineffective) Financial Statecraft of China's Bilateral Swap Agreements
Leaving the Nest
Whither the Indo-Pacific? Middle power strategies from Australia, South Korea and Indonesia
Remaking the architecture
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |