Epizelus (Hdt 6.117)
A Medical History Critique and Reappraisal
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12209833 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James C Ford (University of Liverpool , Liverpool, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 513-524 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social History of Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-631X • E-ISSN: 1477-4666 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/shm/hkaf006 |
| PMID | 41079890 |
| OpenAlex | W4407724644 |
| Language | EN |
Most commentators have argued that the 'curious' tale of Epizelus is the first historical example of anxiety-related combat trauma. While the capacity to experience combat-related trauma is universal across human societies, focussing on whether Epizelus can be diagnosed with a specific contemporary traumatic condition is presentist and misguided. Instead of engaging in disputes about diagnosis, historians are better placed providing a close reading and dissection of the source material informed by historical and cultural historiography, raising new questions and offering a synthesis and analysis that can then be used responsibly by medical scholars. By doing so, the Epizelus episode can be recontextualised as an epiphany of a god: a story with deep meaning for the Athenians by the time that Herodotus was writing in the late fifth-century BC
Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Medicine · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · History
| Highly cited | No |
|---|