Thailand's Rural Doctor Movement
Their Contributions and Challenges
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12216330 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Viroj Tangcharoensathien (0000-0003-3235-0091, International Health Policy Program Ministry of Public Health Nonthaburi Thailand), Jongjit Rittirong (0000-0003-4635-2389, Institute for Population and Social Research Mahidol University Nakhon Pathom Thailand), Pattraporn Chuenglertsiri (Institute for Population and Social Research Mahidol University Nakhon Pathom Thailand), Pongthep Wongwatcharapaiboon (Thai Health Promotion Foundation Bangkok Thailand), Joseph Harris (0000-0002-7458-6580, Department of Sociology Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0952-1895 • E-ISSN: 1468-0491 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/gove.70053 |
| OpenAlex | W4413839665 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 51 |
Thailand's Rural Doctor Movement (RDM) is a “civic movement” organized by rural doctors who are officials in the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH). RDM's political consciousness and ideologies for social justice were cultivated by their exposures to student activism and repression in October 1973 and 1976 and fostered by the exposure to poverty and ill‐health in rural communities while doing compulsory medical service in rural hospitals in the 1970s–1980s, following graduation from medical school. This perspective highlights two major contributions by RDM. First, it fought against the 1998 Drug Scandal and 2009 potential corruption in the MOPH through whistle‐blowing role. Second, RDM advocated for legislation from various statutory bodies that support and fill the gap of MOPH. These bodies include the Thai Health Promotion Foundation, the National Health Security Office, and the National Health Commission Office. The legal mandates of these statutory bodies create conflicts with tobacco, alcohol and beverage industries, pharmaceutical industries and MOPH, which led to consistent efforts to roll back the influence of these para‐statal health organizations formed and led by RDM advocates. RDM's role as whistle‐blowers and advocates for the legislation of statutory bodies provides key lessons for practitioners and policymakers in developing countries. However, they need to adapt to their own policy contexts and policy actors and be agile to grasp the window of opportunity
Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Movement (music · Political science · Regional science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Global Health and Surgery · Global Health Workforce Issues · Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Good Health at Low Cost 25 years on
So you want to be a policy entrepreneur?
Health systems development in Thailand
Democratizing Health Care
Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage
Forty years since Alma-Ata
Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health
Innovation and participation for healthy public policy
Success Counteracting Tobacco Company Interference in Thailand
Annual prevalence of unmet healthcare need in Thailand
The cost of community outreach HIV interventions
Why has the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand achieved a pro-poor public subsidy for health care
Strategies used to initiate the first alcohol control law in Thailand
The Rise of the Octobrists in Contemporary Thailand
Integrity
Who Governs? Autonomous Political Networks as a Challenge to Power in Thailand
| Highly cited | No |
|---|