Egoism, Obligation, and Herbert Spencer
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12228016 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timothy D Wilkinson (0000-0002-7160-9097, corresponding author), Martin Wilkinson |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 69-86 |
| Publication date | 1993-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Utilitas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0953820800005549 |
| OpenAlex | W2128358854 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
The moral and political thought of Herbert Spencer is usually associated with some form of evolutionism. This is unsurprising, since Spencer himself thought of his ideas as founded on evolutionary theory. But it is regrettable, because no one believes in Spencer's form of evolutionism any more, and even if they did, they would not think that it supported his views in the way that he confidently believed. And so Spencer has been largely neglected since his death. His libertarianism is thought to be without foundation, and so few have thought it worth study. But in this paper I try to show that Spencer's moral and political conclusions can be based on some of the non-evolutionary arguments that he offered. Although these arguments are not entirely compelling, they have force in a way that his evolutionary claims do not
Epistemology · Ethical egoism · Evolutionism · Foundation (evidence · Libertarianism · Moral obligation · Obligation · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Highly cited | No |
|---|