Voluntarism and the Origins of Utilitarianism

Bibliographic Data

ID12228147
AuthorsJ B Schneewind (Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume7
Issue1
Pages87-96
Publication date1995-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUtilitas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0953820800001862
OpenAlexW2121348314
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited4

In the paper I offer a brief sketch of one of the sources of utilitarianism. Our biological ancestry is a matter of fact that is not altered by the way we describe ourselves. With philosophical theories it is otherwise. Utilitarianism can be described in ways that make it look as if it is as old as moral philosophy – as J. S. Mill thought it was. For my historical purposes, it is more useful to have an account that brings out what is specific about Benthamism and its descendants. Let us try to make do with the following. First, utilitarianism asserts that the fundamental requirement of morality is that we are to maximize good, for everyone and not just for the agent. This basic principle presupposes that it makes sense to think of aggregating goods to make a total, and of comparing amounts of good thus aggregated. Second, the good to be brought about is located in feelings of pleasure, and the evil to be avoided in feelings of pain. These feelings have inherent value or disvalue regardless of how they are caused to exist and regardless of their own consequences. Third, all moral principles can be derived from the requirement that good be maximized. The principles involved in evaluating agents as well as in giving moral direction to action are nothing but applications of the basic principle

Action (physics · Epistemology · Feeling · Mill · Moral philosophy · Morality · Nothing · Pleasure · Sketch · Sociology · Utilitarianism · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub