Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Playing Dice with Morality

Weighted Lotteries and the Number Problem

Bibliographic Data

ID12228379
AuthorsMathieu Doucet (0000-0002-2453-3915, University of Waterloo, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume25
Issue2
Pages161-181
Publication date2013-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUtilitas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0953820812000374
OpenAlexW1992103826
LanguageEN
References cited20

In this article I criticize the non-consequentialist Weighted Lottery (WL) solution to the choice between saving a smaller or a larger group of people. WL aims to avoid what non-consequentialists see as consequentialism's unfair aggregation by giving equal consideration to each individual's claim to be rescued. In so doing, I argue, WL runs into another common objection to consequentialism: it is excessively demanding. WL links the right action with the outcome of a fairly weighted lottery, which means that an agent can only act rightly if s/he has actually run the lottery. In many actual cases, this involves epistemic demands that can be almost impossible to meet. I argue that plausible moral principles cannot make such extreme epistemic demands

Action (physics · Consequentialism · Dice · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Lottery · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Morality · Outcome (game theory · Positive economics · Statistics · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Groundwork of The Metaphysic of Morals

    Immanuel Kant•Immanuel Kant•2020

  • Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality (1984)

    Open Access•Peter Railton•Facts, Values, and Norms•2003

  • V—Fairness

    John Broome•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1991

  • Utilitarianism

    Bernard Williams, J J C Smart•Utilitarianism•2013

  • The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect

    Philippa Foot•Virtues and vices and other…•2002

  • Famine, Affluence, and Morality

    Peter Singer•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • What We Owe to Each Other

    T M Scanlon, Thomas Scanlon•What We Owe to Each Other•2000

  • Virtues and Vices

    Philippa Foot•Virtues and vices and other…•2002

  • In Defense of a Version of Satisficing Consequentialism

    Open Access•Jason Rogers•Utilitas•2010

  • Who Is Afraid of Numbers

    Open Access•Matthew Liao•Utilitas•2008

  • The Demandingness of Scanlon’s Contractualism

    Elizabeth Ashford•Ethics•2003

  • The Numbers Problem

    Open Access•Nien‐hê Hsieh, Nien-Hê Hsieh et al.•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2006

  • Consequentialism and Cluelessness

    Open Access•James Lenman•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2000

  • Can a Nonconsequentialist Count Lives

    Open Access•David Wasserman, David H Wasserman et al.•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2003

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae