Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Adjudication and Expectations

Bentham on the Role of Judges

Bibliographic Data

ID12228481
AuthorsFrancesco Ferraro (0000-0003-4879-2177, University of Milan, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume25
Issue2
Pages140-160
Publication date2013-05-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUtilitas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0953820812000349
OpenAlexW1991872650
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited14

According to a well-established interpretive line, the Benthamic judge would be allowed no room for autonomous calculations of utility and his or her task would only be that of mechanically applying substantive law, which expresses the legislator's will. For Gerald Postema, in contrast, Bentham's judge would be granted ample power to decide cases by directly applying the principle of utility. This article criticizes both views, by showing that a ‘mechanical’ adjudication was for Bentham utterly impossible, although this does not mean that judges should be free to decide according to direct utility calculations. Judges must be the tutors of the citizens’ expectations, which, under a system of statute law, will focus on the code. However, they can avoid suboptimality in cases where applying a general rule would not maximize utility, without preponderant damage for law-induced expectations: Bentham's suggestion is that they do so by proposing amendments of the code to the legislature

Adjudication · Code (set theory · Economics · Law and economics · Legislation · Legislator · Legislature · Political science · Power (physics · Set (abstract data type · Statute · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal principles and applications

  • The Dredd-Ful Day of Judgement

    Open Access•Mark Thomas•International Journal for the…•2022

  • Anderson v Dredd [2138] Megacity LR (A) 1

    Open Access•Mark Thomas•International Journal for the…•2022

  • Bentham on Temptation and Deterrence

    Open Access•Steven Sverdlik•Utilitas•2019

  • Lectura histórico-dogmática de la visión de Bentham sobre la admisibilidad de la prueba en el proceso judicial

    Open Access•Álvaro Pérez Ragone, Renzo Cavani•Revista de estudios histórico-juríd…•2022

  • The Gift of Science

    Roger Berkowitz•The Gift of Science•2005

  • General theory of law and state

    Hans Kelsen•General theory of law and state•1961

  • The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: 'Legislator of the World': Writings on Codification, Law, and Education

    Jeremy Bentham, Philip Schofield et al.•Legislator of the World•1998

  • The Province of Legislation Determined

    Open Access•David Lieberman•Province of Legislation Determined•1989

  • Napoleon and His Code

    Charles Sumner Lobingier•Harvard Law Review•1918

  • Utility and Democracy

    Philip Schofield•Utility and Democracy•2006

  • Bentham on the Public Character of Law

    Open Access•Gerald J Postema•Utilitas•1989

  • Adjudication under Bentham's Pannomion

    Open Access•J R Dinwiddy•Utilitas•1989

  • Law & Geometry

    M H Hoeflich, Michael Hoeflich•American Journal of Legal History•1986

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,57
Citation span2019 - 2022 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae