Taking Utilitarianism Seriously
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12228569 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul J Kelly (0000-0001-9040-1868, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 341-355 |
| Publication date | 1996-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Utilitas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0953820800005045 |
| OpenAlex | W2058721668 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
With a book as wide ranging and insightful as Barry's Justice as Impartiality , it is perhaps a little churlish to criticize it for paying insufficient attention to one's own particular interests. That said, in what follows I am going to do just that and claim that in an important sense Barry does not take utilitarianism seriously. Utilitarianism does receive some discussion in Barry's book, and in an important section which I will discuss he even appears to concede that utilitarianism provides a rival though ultimately inadequate theory of justice. Nevertheless, utilitarianism is not considered a rival to ‘justice as impartiality’ in the way that ‘justice as mutual advantage’ and ‘justice as reciprocity’ are. One response, and perhaps the only adequate response, would be to construct a rival utilitarian theory. I cannot provide such a theory in this paper, and I certainly would be very cautious about claiming that I could provide such a theory elsewhere. What I want to suggest is that utilitarianism is a genuine third theory to contrast with ‘justice as mutual advantage’ and ‘justice as impartiality’ – ‘justice as reciprocity’ being merely a hybrid of ‘justice as mutual advantage’, at least as Barry presents it (pp. 46–51). I also want to argue that it poses a more significant challenge to a contractualist theory such as Barry's than his discussion of utilitarianism reveals
Economic Justice · Economics · Epistemology · Impartiality · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology · Social science · Sociology · Utilitarianism · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|