Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intuitions and the Demands of Consequentialism

Bibliographic Data

ID12228772
AuthorsMatthew Tedesco (0000-0002-3250-4145, Beloit College, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume23
Issue1
Pages94-104
Publication date2011-02-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUtilitas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0953820810000476
OpenAlexW2056520174
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited19

One response to the demandingness objection is that it begs the question against consequentialism by assuming a moral distinction between what a theory requires and what it permits. According to the consequentialist, this distinction stands in need of defense. However, this response may also beg the question, this time at the methodological level, regarding the credibility of the intuitions underlying the objection. The success of the consequentialist's response thus turns on the role we assign to intuitions in our moral methodology. After presenting the demandingness objection to consequentialism and revealing the underlying methodological stalemate, I break the stalemate by appealing to research in the cognitive neuroscience of intuitions. Given the evidence for the hypothesis that our moral intuitions are fundamentally emotional (rather than rational) responses, we should give our intuitions a modest (rather than robust) role in our moral methodology. This rescues the consequentialist's response to the demandingness objection

Consequentialism · Credibility · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Stalemate · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Overdemanding Consequentialism? An Experimental Approach

    Open Access•Martin Bruder, Attila Tanyi•Utilitas•2014

  • Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1976

  • Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection

    Frank Jackson•Ethics•1991

  • Ethics and Intuitions

    Open Access•Peter Singer•The Journal of Ethics•2005

  • How (and where) does moral judgment work?

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua Greene et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2002

  • Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions

    Jonathan M Weinberg, Shaun Nichol et al.•Philosophical Topics•2001

  • The emotional dog and its rational tail

    Jonathan Haidt•Psychological Review•2001

  • An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Science•2001

  • Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory

    Liam Murphy, Liam B Murphy•Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory…•2000

  • Utilitarianism

    Bernard Williams, J J C Smart•Utilitarianism•2013

  • The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect

    Philippa Foot•Virtues and vices and other…•2002

  • Famine, Affluence, and Morality

    Peter Singer•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics

    John Rawls•The Philosophical Review•1951

  • Ideal Code, Real World

    Brad Hooker•Ideal code, real world•2002

  • The Rejection of Consequentialism

    Samuel Scheffler•Rejection of Consequentialism•1984

Citations per year0.08
Citation span2014 - 2014 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae