A Response to the Claim 'There is no Problem for Transcendental Realism Here
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12229267 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen Parsons (0000-0002-0428-9732, De Montfort University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 115-123 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Political Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8259 • E-ISSN: 1465-3982 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09538250150210630 |
| OpenAlex | W2001240089 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
My review of Tony Lawson's book Economics and Reality sought to clarify the nature of transcendental realism (TR) and indicate disagreements with its claims. I thank Jochen Runde for taking the time and trouble to respond to my review. Reading Runde's response made me aware that various points in my initial review were possibly not as clearly formulated as they could have been. I am thankful for the opportunity to remedy this deficiency. I would like this response to be as constructive as possible. To facilitate this, I will formulate a series of questions regarding areas where I still feel clarification of the TR position would be beneficial
Constructive · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Position (finance · Positive economics · Process (computing · Reading (process · Realism · Sociology · Transcendental number · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Political Economy and Marxism
The general theory of employment, interest, and money
Economics and Reality
An Introduction to Philosophical Logic
Philosophy
The Possibility of Naturalism
On Stephen Parsons' Philosophical Critique of Transcendental Realism
Economics and Reality
Hegel contra sociology
Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|