Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is precautionary saving futile? A critique of orthodox theory

Bibliographic Data

ID12229804
AuthorsJoseph G Eisenhauer (0000-0002-2280-5235, Canisius College, corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume7
Issue4
Pages415-429
Publication date1995-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueReview of Political Economy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0953-8259 • E-ISSN: 1465-3982
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09538259500000048
OpenAlexW2089169003
LanguageEN
References cited33

The orthodox theory of precautionary saving fails to distinguish risk from uncertainty, and thus assumes the existence of a probability distribution governing an individual's future income prospects. The individual is assumed to be motivated to save by the dispersion in the distribution of future income, and researchers have therefore attempted to correlate saving with income variance. However, the empirical evidence tends to refute any such correlation. This paper proposes a concept of futility to describe actions that cannot affect the external environment, and demonstrates that precautionary saving in the orthodox sense is futile inasmuch as saving cannot alter the dispersion of resources around an expected future value. Despite the inadequacy of orthodox theory, the theory is perpetuated because even futile behaviour is consistent with the neoclassical notion of rationality. The retention of an invalid theory of precaution provides a faulty basis for both empirical research and policy analysis; thus, the present paper suggests an alternative approach to precaution based on the work of Knight and Shackle, in which decisions are made under conditions of uncertainty rather than risk

Distribution (mathematics · Economics · Knight · Microeconomics · Neoclassical economics · Positive economics · Precautionary principle · Rationality · Shackle · Value (mathematics · Variance (accounting · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Law · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy

  • Decision, order, and time in human affairs

    G L S Shackle•Decision, order, and time in…•1969

  • Epistemological Problems of Economics

    Ludwig Von Mises•Epistemological Problems of…•2020

  • Understanding Consumption

    Angus Deaton•Understanding Consumption•1992

  • Increasing risk

    Open Access•Michael Rothschild, Joseph E Stiglitz•Journal of Economic Theory•1970

  • Rationality in Psychology and Economics

    Herbert A Simon•The Journal of Business•1986

  • Saving and Uncertainty

    Hayne E Leland•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1968

  • Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large

    John W Pratt•Econometrica•1964

  • Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy

    Gaël Fain, Joseph Alois Schumpeter et al.•Capitalism, socialism, and…•2010

  • Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs

    Carol Blake, G L S Shackle•The Philosophical Quarterly•1962

  • Expectation in Economics

    Open Access•Henri Guitton, G L S Shackle et al.•Revue économique•1953

  • Precautionary Saving and the Timing of Taxes

    Miles S Kimball, Miles Kimball et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1989

  • Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective

    Open Access•Paul Davidson•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  • More on Unemployment Insurance as Insurance

    Frank P Stafford•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1977

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae