The Conceptual Flaw in the Microeconomic Foundations of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12230011 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colin Rogers (0000-0002-5443-6040, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-83 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Political Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-8259 • E-ISSN: 1465-3982 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09538259.2018.1442894 |
| OpenAlex | W2801791096 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 23 |
First-generation dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models have been criticized for their lack of financial markets but, more perceptively, for their barter properties. This note explains why the second of these criticisms is fundamental. All DSGE models are built on frictionless, perfect barter, Walrasian microeconomic foundations. Introducing money and banks into such models converts them into a ‘friction’ contra the fundamental principle that monetary exchange is more efficient than barter. This insoluble difficulty with the microeconomic foundations of DSGE models arises because theorists ignore the Hahn problem that applies to all monetary models based on Walrasian general equilibrium (GE) microeconomic foundations. The Hahn problem reveals three things. First, a perfect barter GE solution always exists in any ‘monetary’ model erected on Walrasian GE microeconomic foundations. Second, inessential monetary features are easily attached to perfect barter microeconomic foundations but as easily removed, leaving the perfect barter solution intact. Third, attaching such inessential additions leads to logical error; the misuse of language that produces invalid conclusions. A second-generation DSGE model that is intended to increase understanding of financial crises is then examined to show that it suffers from the Hahn problem; it converts banking and financial markets into ‘frictions’, and words and economic concepts take on different meanings. That renders the new DSGE model impossible to interpret or use as a basis for advice on monetary policy
Barter · Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium · Economics · General equilibrium theory · Keynesian economics · Macroeconomics · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Monetary policy · Neoclassical economics · Economic theories and models · Economic Theory and Policy · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy
An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area
Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles
Is something really wrong with macroeconomics
Money and Markets
The Continuing Muddles of Monetary Theory
A Neoclassical Analysis of Macroeconomic Policy
| Citations per year | 0.86 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |