Worthwhile work? Childcare, feminist ethics and cooperative research practices
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12232148 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yarrow Andrew (0000-0003-3050-2602, Flinders University, corresponding author), Lara Corr (Australian National University), Connie Lent (Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA), Maeve O’Brien (0000-0003-1725-5803, St Patrick's College), Jayne Osgood (0000-0001-9424-8602, Education, Middlesex University, London, UK), Margaret Boyd (Bridgewater State University) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 553-568 |
| Publication date | 2016-10-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Gender and Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-0253 • E-ISSN: 1360-0516 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09540253.2016.1247948 |
| OpenAlex | W2532481893 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 34 |
Interdisciplinary research collaborations are often encouraged within higher education while the practicalities of such collaborations are glossed over. This project specifically addresses the praxis of research collaborations, exploring how feminist academics within different countries and disciplines came together to explore their mutual concern about the perceived worth and well-being of early childhood practitioners. Engaging in a formal methodological dialogue over eight months, seven academics discussed, analysed and dissected their different investments in research methods and intents, with the aim of agreeing to a common methodological framework. Unexpectedly, what emerged was not a product, but a process. We argue that this process offers much to those seeking deep collaboration in and through shared research. Building on a collective research interest, we found ourselves in a process of becoming, germinating the seed of a transnational research cooperative, based on trust and mutual respect, rather than the arid methodological contract originally envisioned
Engineering ethics · Feminism · Pedagogy · Political science · Praxis · Process (computing · Product (mathematics · Public relations · Sociology · Work (physics · Children's Rights and Participation · Gender Studies · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Social Work Education and Practice
Getting Smart
Reflections on qualitative data analysis
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Disruptive Voices
The Moral Significance of Class
How to Ask for a Study in Qualitatisch
Critical feminist reflexivity and the politics of whiteness in the ‘field’
Women ‘learning to labour’ in the ‘male emporium’
The posts continue
Post-qualitative research
Re-turning feminist methodologies
Pedagogical staff in children’s day care centres in Germany – links between working conditions, job satisfaction, commitment and work-related stress
Reinventing grounded theory
Seeing education with one's own eyes and through Pisa lenses
Changing the Social Relations of Research Production
Images of thinking in feminist materialisms
Paperwork, Rotas, Words and Posters
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
Situated Knowledges
Decolonizing Methodologies
Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene
Voice Without a Subject
Methodology brut
The Pedagogical Turn
Scholarly Innovation for Difficult Times
Feminist Science
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
Contradiction of Terms
Identity and Intervention
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |