Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Woolly, Half-Baked and Impractical'? British Responses to the Commission on the Status of Women and the Convention on the Political Rights of Women 1946-67

Bibliographic Data

ID12239260
AuthorsHelen Laville (University of Birmingham, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume23
Issue4
Pages473-495
Publication date2011-10-27
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTwentieth Century British History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0955-2359 • E-ISSN: 1477-4674
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/tcbh/hwr043
OpenAlexW2332528984
LanguageEN

This article traces the relationship between women's associations and the British government with regard to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), from its establishment in 1946 to British ratification of the Convention on the Political Rights of Women (CPRW) in 1967. Whilst international women's associations were instrumental in articulating the legitimacy of women's rights as an international concern in the inter-war period, and in securing the establishment of the CSW, appointment to the Commission was controlled, not by these organizations, but by national governments. Whilst many countries selected their delegates from women's associations, the British government rejected this approach and instead selected their delegates on the basis of party political affiliation. These delegates were consequently less interested in the promotion of the international women's rights agenda than in the protection of British interests and reputation. A lobbying campaign by British women's associations worked to secure more expert British representation and to ensure that the British position was more sympathetic to the goals of the Commission. This lobbying was not limited to the question of representation, but included support for the work of the Commission: women's associations and their allies in government urged the UK to ratify the CPRW. This article argues that successful ratification of the CPRW reflected both the persistence of the women involved and also the changing context of both British domestic and colonial rule and the British position on United Nations-sponsored human rights

Commission · Context (archaeology · Convention · Government (linguistics · Human rights · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Ratification · Reputation · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender, Security, and Conflict · International Human Rights and Reproductive Law · History · Law · Public Administration

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae