Democratic Hegemony and American Hegemony
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12240881 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alfredo G A Valladão (Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 243-260 |
| Publication date | 2006-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cambridge Review of International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0955-7571 • E-ISSN: 1474-449X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09557570600723712 |
| OpenAlex | W2090460617 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
The emergence of an ‘American democratic empire’, rising from the global informational and transportation revolution, that has its epicentre situated on the territory of the United States (US), has produced a profound metamorphosis in world affairs. National power elites, including those in America, are confronting a dilemma. They are compelled to accept, favour and even defend the so-called globalisation process in order to avoid further erosion of their economic and political power. On the other hand, this process is also directly threatening this same power. The paradox is that the US is the main promoter and defender of last resort of the new global ‘order’, which at the same time is restricting its own margins for sovereign action. The ‘democratic empire’ is thus fostering the rise of a democratic hegemonism at the expense of a ‘US hegemonism’. This democratic hegemonism is a gradually rising—and fragile—consensus on a proliferating set of perceptions and values, stressing individual freedom, responsibility and political and social activism. This consensus arises from the material possibilities of a more individualistic way of life and the increasing capacity of single individuals or organised groups to participate in global and local political decision-making processes. This is a process that favours the empowerment of interest groups whose reference is no longer solely the nation-state. Hence, traditional power elites are progressively losing their ability to present themselves as the ultimate embodiment of a national ‘general interest’. The irony of the seemingly intractable contradiction between US hegemonism and democratic hegemonism is that the actual spreading of the logic of the latter is closely dependent on US power and willingness to defend its own national interest. The greatest challenge for the coming decades will be the construction of supranational governance institutions under democratic hegemony, so as to avoid a classic imperial self-isolation of the US—a situation that would trigger the inevitable demise of democratic hegemonism and, for the time being, of any order as such
Democracy · Empire · Globalization · Hegemony · International relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism · European Union Policy and Governance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
The New Imperial Presidency
Transnational Capitalist Class
La Tierra Es Plana
Transnational Capitalist Class, The
A Theory of Global Capitalism
European Union and New Regionalism
The Twenty-First Century Will Be American
Power, Terror, Peace, and War
Realism under Praise, or a Requiem? The Paradigmatic Debate in International Relations
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |