Understanding Collaborative Value Creation by Environmental Nonprofit and Renewable Energy Business Partnerships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12248751 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alex Lyakhov (corresponding author), Travis Gliedt (0000-0003-4638-3353) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1448-1472 |
| Publication date | 2016-02-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Voluntas Revista Internacional de Filosofia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2179-3786 • E-ISSN: 1573-7888 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11266-016-9691-6 |
| OpenAlex | W2283690624 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 46 |
Many environmental nonprofit organizations (ENPOs) seek to create sustainability value by promoting environmental principles and influencing policymakers to support pro-environmental legislation. One strategy used by ENPOs to enhance the value creation process is the development of partnerships with businesses. Semi-structured interviews with leaders of six national ENPOs in the United States were conducted to examine the sources and types of value created by collaborations with renewable energy businesses, and the partnership processes and outcomes that are most desirable. The goal was to understand how and why ENPOs seek partnerships, what the potential benefits are, and whether or not ENPO leadership orientation, as characterized by their perceptions of the political opportunity structure, political ideology, and environmental philosophy, led to different views of partnerships for sustainability value creation. The finding that differences in the partnership perspectives of the ENPO leadership did not directly link to differences in the leadership orientations suggests that none of the orientations precluded partnering in general and may even have been enablers in some cases
Business · Corporate social responsibility · Creating shared value · General partnership · Ideology · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sustainability · Value (mathematics · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Marketing
Red Lines and Green Lights
Relational Communication as a Partnership-Building Tool for Environmental Nonprofits
What influences where volunteers practice environmental stewardship? The role of scale(s) in sorting stewards
On the Possible Existence of a ‘First Law of Environmental Stewardship’
Identities, innovation, and governance
Institutional Factors as Antecedents of Energy Efficiency Policies at the Local Level
Social innovation for a new energy model, from theory to action
The Critical Role of the Initial Stages of Cross-Sector Partnerships and Their Implications for Partnerships’ Outcomes
Monotonic market change
Multi‐stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development
Collaborative Value Creation
Collaborative Value Creation
Corporations and NGOs
Selecting Repertoires of Action in Environmental Movement Organizations
Winds of Change
The Purpose (and Perils) of Government-Nonprofit Partnership
Power in Movement
Friend or foe? Why US energy efficiency nonprofits collaborate with business and government
Canadian Leapfrog
Financial Sustainability Within UK Charities
Collaboration Between Nonprofit and Business Sectors
Environmental Discourse and Social Movement Organizations
The Organizational Dynamics of the U.S. Environmental Movement
Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process
Beyond the Contract
The Organizational Structure of Local Environmentalism
When and how can advocacy groups promote new technologies? Conditions and strategies for effectiveness
The Environmental Movement and the Modes of Political Action
What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research
Social Movements and Organizational Form
Changing Issue Representation among Major United States Environmental Movement Organizations
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |