Countering Insurgent-terrorism

History teaches that counterinsurgency and counterterrorism campaigns have never been won through purely military action. Defeating an opponent who avoids open battle, but who uses force to reach his goals, including terrorist action, requires a combination of police, administrative, economic and military measures. As a counterinsurgency campaign should pursue a comprehensive political objective, it requires high levels of civil–military cooperation. However, current NATO doctrine for Civil–Military Cooperation (CIMIC) as it emerged from the 1990s is founded in conventional war-fighting and outdated peacekeeping doctrine. CIMIC's focus is on supporting military objectives rather than enabling the military to make a coherent contribution to political objectives. This makes CIMIC unfit for the Alliance's main operational challenges that have expanded from peace operations on the Balkans to countering insurgent terrorism in Afghanistan. When developing CIMIC, the Alliance obviously neglected the historical lessons from counterinsurgency campaigns

Adversary · Alliance · Battle · Civil–military relations · Computer security · Doctrine · Insurgency · Military doctrine · Military strategy · Military tactics · Peacekeeping · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Terrorism · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Military History and Strategy

• Forging Civil–Military Cooperation

  Jan Daniel, Markéta Wittichová•Journal of Intervention and…•2020

  Add to list