On ‘Strategic Frontiers’

Debating the Borders of the Post-Second World War Balkans

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12269331
AutoresTheodora Dragostinova (0000-0002-9181-9905, Ohio University Lancaster, autor de correspondencia)
Año2018
Volumen27
Número3
Páginas387-411
Fecha de publicación2018-05-09
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaContemporary European History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0960-7773 • E-ISSN: 1469-2171
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0960777318000243
OpenAlexW2800980985
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas48

This article examines debates between Bulgaria, Greece and Yugoslavia concerning the post-Second World War Balkan borders in preparation for the Paris Peace Conference of 1946. While for most of the twentieth century Greece and Yugoslavia were close allies united in their position against revisionist Bulgaria, after 1944 the communist affiliations of the new Bulgarian and Yugoslav governments determined the rapprochement between the latter two states. As various proposals for border revisions and the possibility of a Balkan Federation were discussed, the Balkans became a prime battlefield in the emerging Cold War split between the Soviet Union, Britain and the United States. By examining a period of extreme political fluidity between 1944 and 1947, this article explores how the legacy of long-standing national tensions combined with the new political realities after the Second World War created the current borders of Bulgaria, Greece and the (former Yugoslav) Republic of Macedonia

Ancient history · Battlefield · Bulgarian · Cold war · Communism · Economic history · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · World War II · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · History · Law · Soviet and Russian History