Carnage by Computer’
The Blackboard Economics of the 2001 Foot and Mouth Epidemic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12282903 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Campbell (0000-0003-0525-8150, Cardiff Law School and ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), UK, corresponding author), Robert Lee (0000-0002-3214-9577, Cardiff Law School and ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), UK) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 425-459 |
| Publication date | 2003-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social & Legal Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0964-6639 • E-ISSN: 1461-7390 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0964663903012004002 |
| OpenAlex | W2163856120 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 12 |
The foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the UK in 2001 had devastating consequences, including the slaughter of millions of animals and huge losses to the rural economy. The regulatory policies devised to deal with FMD so gravely misconceived the magnitude of the risk that an outbreak was destined to become an epidemic. This article seeks to draw lessons for regulatory policy by examining the nature of the disaster and the chosen methods of control both before and during the epidemic. It rejects the analysis of the epidemic offered by the government agency responsible and argues that the policies adopted provide a classic example of Coase’s notion of ‘black-board economics’. The public interventions, although appearing to work splendidly in the abstract, showed little sensitivity to the conditions actually prevailing in modern livestock rearing, and as a result their consequences were not merely imperfect but actually pernicious. We reach the sad conclusion that few lessons have been learned from the outbreak, as the very practices largely responsible for the epidemic are still prevalent, and as legislation and contingency planning show signs of a preparedness merely to repeat the same mistakes
Agency (philosophy · Contingency plan · Economics · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Political science · Preparedness · Social science · Sociology · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law · Vector-Borne Animal Diseases
Ten Years on
Regulation
Poetic Justice? Rural policy clashes with rural poetry in the 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth disease in the UK
No better or worse off”
Situating local experience of risk
ANT, multiplicity and policy
Why slaughter? The cultural dimensions of Britain's foot and mouth disease control policy, 1892?2001
Organised Chaos
Disaster in Agriculture
Media, Metaphors and Modelling
Flames and fear on the farms
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2004 - 2021 (18) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |