The Politics of Policing Hate

Boundary Work, Social Inequalities, and Legitimacy

Bibliographic Data

ID12282958
AuthorsRandi Solhjell (0000-0001-7858-9722, University of Oslo, corresponding author), Henning Kaiser Klatran (0000-0002-1512-3383, Norwegian Police University College, Oslo, Norway)
Year2023
Volume33
Issue4
Pages620-641
Publication date2023-09-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial & Legal Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-6639 • E-ISSN: 1461-7390
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/09646639231201912
OpenAlexW4386803506
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited57

This article investigates how police officers and prosecutors make sense of and speak about their work with hate crimes. Our analysis rests upon Robert Reiner's widely acknowledged claim that policing is inherently political. We identified three core issues that illustrate the political nature of policing hate crimes. First, the politically contingent boundary work of distinguishing criminal from legal acts. Second, the impact of the enforcement of hate crime laws on the reproduction of social inequalities. Third, the “diversity politics” of gaining legitimacy and trust among minorities, which hate crime legislation is meant to protect. While a strong commitment to policing hate crimes is evident among our interviewees, we ask if the politically invested discourse they present may contribute to an absence of critical reflections regarding the limited effect of law enforcement, as well as a lack of engagement with pressing concerns regarding racialized crime control and racism

Crime control · Criminal justice · Criminology · Hate crime · Law enforcement · Legislation · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Racism · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access