Ombudsman section
Lessons from devolution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12284189 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Kirkham (0000-0003-3147-1633, University of Sheffield, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 325-334 |
| Publication date | 2010-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Social Welfare Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-8033 • E-ISSN: 1469-9621 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09649069.2010.520525 |
| OpenAlex | W2022009476 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
One of the benefits of devolution is that it allows for experimentation, with different areas of the UK freed from Westminster/Whitehall control to identify new solutions to problems of governance. Under the devolution arrangements this relative freedom to develop new methods and approaches is one that applies to much of the administrative justice system. Indeed, in a previous edition of this journal, a review of regulatory arrangements in Scotland was analysed that demonstrated very well this potential for experimentation (Crerar 2007, 7; Kirkham 2009). This review has occurred in advance of similar efforts elsewhere in the UK and the lessons learnt in Scotland should help and influence those debates when they occur
Business · Corporate governance · Devolution (biology · Economic Justice · Economics · Law and economics · Management · Political science · Section (typography · Sociology · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2013 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |