Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Family law without lawyers – A systems theory perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID12284331
AuthorsAdrienne Barnett (0000-0002-8435-306X, Brunel Law School, Brunel University London, London, UK, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume39
Issue2
Pages223-245
Publication date2017-03-27
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Social Welfare Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-8033 • E-ISSN: 1469-9621
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09649069.2017.1306355
OpenAlexW2591586034
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited21

Prior to the loss of legal aid for many litigants in private law Children Act proceedings occasioned by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, family lawyers were observed to pressurise victims of domestic violence to agree to unsafe contact orders. Drawing on Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic social systems, this article suggests that, since April 2013, family lawyers have been repositioned as the champions of victims of domestic violence, and considers what this tells us about the way in which family law is observed to operate without lawyers in many cases. It suggests that the problems that litigants in person create for the orderly running of proceedings and the continued operations of the legal system have led to a perceived crisis for justice, but that family law is likely to survive without lawyers in many cases, although little change can be observed in the substantive law

Autopoiesis · Criminology · Domestic violence · Economic Justice · Family law · Perspective (graphical · Poison control · Political science · Punishment (psychology · Sociology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Introduction

    Rosemary Hunter, Adrienne Barnett et al.•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2018

  • Years of Luhmann's legacy in the Anglophone academic community

    Youngju Sohn•International Review of Sociology•2020

  • Law as an autopoietic system

    Gunther Teubner•Law as an autopoietic system•1993

  • Law As A Social System

    N Luhmann•Law as a social system•2004

  • Luhmann's theory of knowledge

    Jac Christis•Soziale Systeme•2001

  • Supervised, Supported and Indirect Contact Orders

    Allen Perry, BARBARA RAINEY•International Journal of Law…•2007

  • Picking up the pieces

    Rosemary Hunter•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2013

  • Good' and 'bad’ lawyers? Struggling in the shadow of the new law

    Bren Neale, Carol Smart•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•1997

  • Assumptions about children's best interests

    Christine Piper•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2000

  • Divorce Reform and the Image of the Child

    Christine Piper•Journal of Law and Society•1996

  • Beyond Procedural Legitimation

    Open Access•Jiří PřbáAň•Journal of Law and Society•1997

  • Beyond Procedural Legitimation

    Open Access•Jiri Priban•Journal of Law and Society•1997

  • Family Lawyers

    Louise Spitz, John Eekelaar et al.•University of Toronto Law Journal•2002

  • Systemic Power

    Open Access•C Borch•Acta Sociologica•2005

  • Being Sensible

    Open Access•Michael King•Journal of Social Policy•1999

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2018 - 2020 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae