What outcomes are important to people with long-term neurological conditions using integrated health and social care
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12289248 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gemma Frances Spiers (0000-0003-2121-4529, University of York, corresponding author), Gemma Spiers (Social Policy Research Unit; University of York; York UK), Fiona Aspinal (0000-0003-3170-7570, Social Policy Research Unit; University of York; York UK), Sylvia Bernard (Social Policy Research Unit; University of York; York UK), Gillian Parker (0000-0002-2221-6748, Social Policy Research Unit; University of York; York UK) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 559-568 |
| Publication date | 2014-12-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health & Social Care in the Community (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-0410 • E-ISSN: 1365-2524 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hsc.12171 |
| PMID | 25443968 |
| OpenAlex | W2136948471 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 15 |
Measuring the outcomes that are meaningful to people with long-term neurological conditions (LTNCs) using integrated health and social care services may help to assess the effectiveness of integration. Conventional outcomes tend not to be derived from service user experiences, nor are they able to demonstrate the impact of integrated working. This paper reports findings about outcomes identified as being important to people with LTNCs using integrated services. We undertook qualitative work with five community neuro-rehabilitation teams that were integrated in different ways and to different degrees. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 people with LTNCs using these teams. Data were collected between 2010 and 2011 and analysed using an adapted version of the Framework approach. We identified 20 outcomes across three domains: personal comfort outcomes, social and economic participation outcomes, and autonomy outcomes. Inter-relationships between outcomes, both within and across domains, were evident. The outcomes, and the inter-relationships between them, have implications for how individuals are assessed in practice
Autonomy · Community integration · Health care · Integrated care · Long-term care · Older people · Social care · Social integration · Sociology · Applied Psychology · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology · Social Work · Gerontology · Rehabilitation
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research
Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services
Integrated care
Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design
Partnership working and outcomes
Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home
Qualitative Data Analysis
The qualitative research interview
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |