Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Preventing pressure ulcers in nursing homes using a care bundle

A feasibility study

Bibliographic Data

ID12290290
AuthorsJacqueline F Lavallée (0000-0003-2858-8996, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester UK, corresponding author), T A Gray (0000-0002-8088-0698, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Jo C Dumville (0000-0002-6546-3685, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre), Jo Dumville (Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester UK), Nicky Cullum (0000-0003-2631-123X, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester UK)
Year2019
Volume27
Issue4
Pagese417-e427
Publication date2019-03-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth & Social Care in the Community (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0966-0410 • E-ISSN: 1365-2524
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hsc.12742
PMID30919525
OpenAlexW2933346202
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited29

Pressure ulcers can be painful and negatively affect health-related quality of life and healthcare costs. Many people living in nursing homes are at risk of developing a pressure ulcer. Nursing home staff, tissue viability nurses and researchers have co-designed the first theory and evidence-informed care bundle specifically for nursing homes, which consists of three prevention practices (skin inspection, support surfaces, repositioning) and a range of behaviour change techniques to promote these practices. We conducted a mixed methods feasibility study of the use of this care bundle in one nursing home in the North of England using an uncontrolled, before-and-after study design. We collected quantitative data on pressure ulcer prevention behaviours of the nursing home staff and pressure ulcer incidence rates for 5 weeks prior to implementing the bundle. Data collection continued for a further 9 weeks during the bundle implementation phase. We explored adherence to the bundle and participants' experiences of using it. The Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity and the Theoretical Domains Framework informed the semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and deductive framework analysis respectively. We collected data for 462 resident bed days prior to implementing the bundle; five new pressure ulcers were recorded and repositioning was the only documented pressure ulcer prevention behaviour. We collected data for 1,181 resident bed days during the intervention phase; no new pressure ulcers developed and the documented prevention behaviours included repositioning, skin inspection and checking support surfaces. Participants reported that the bundle enhanced the care they delivered and offered suggestions for future improvements. Our findings have highlighted a number of feasibility issues surrounding recruitment and retention, collecting data and implementation fidelity. A pressure ulcer prevention bundle specifically designed for nursing homes was acceptable. The feasibility work has highlighted the potential for the intervention and the areas that require development and refinement

Bundle · Data collection · Health care · Intervention (counseling · Qualitative research · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Nursing · Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management

  • Automated Machine Learning for Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Home Care Centers Throughout Taiwan

    Open Access•Shwu-Feng Tsay, Jih Mei Lai et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2026

  • Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme.

    Susan Michie, Andrew Prestwich•Health Psychology•2010

  • Acceptability of healthcare interventions

    Open Access•Mandeep Sekhon, Martin Cartwright et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2017

  • Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

    Open Access•James E Cane, James Cane et al.•Implementation Science•2012

  • Knowledge translation of research findings

    Open Access•Jeremy M Grimshaw, Martin Eccles et al.•Implementation Science•2012

  • A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity

    Open Access•Christopher Carroll, Malcolm Patterson et al.•Implementation Science•2007

  • Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice

    Susan Michie•BMJ Quality & Safety•2005

  • Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

    Open Access•Nicola Gale, Nicola K Gale et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2013

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions

    Open Access•Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe et al.•BMJ•2008

  • The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies

    Andrew H Van De Ven, Andre L Delbecq•American Journal of Public Health•1972

  • The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques

    Susan Michie, Michelle Richardson et al.•Annals of Behavioral Medicine•2013

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae