A Particular Disappointment?’ Judging Women and the High Court of Australia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12290491 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kcasey Mcloughlin (0000-0001-9447-1759, University of Newcastle Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 273-294 |
| Publication date | 2015-10-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Legal Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-3622 • E-ISSN: 1572-8455 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10691-015-9301-9 |
| OpenAlex | W2162474855 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 24 |
Comity · Disappointment · Dissent · Dissenting opinion · High Court · Identity (music · Jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Issues in South Africa · Psychology · Social Psychology
Feminism and the Power of Law
Creating and recreating gender order in organizations
New Court, New Justice
Finding a Fair Reflection on the High Court of Australia
Justifying Gender Equality on the Bench
The Power of Feminist Judgments
Detailing Judicial Difference
Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory
Glass Ceilings or Gendered Institutions? Mapping the Gender Regimes of Public Sector Worksites
Gender and Justice
The Maiden Speeches of New Zealand Women Members of Parliament
In a different voice
Political and Parliamentary Speech in Australia
Making a Difference
The High Court on Constitutional Law
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,27 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |