Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Grass Snake and the Basilisk

From Pre-Christian Protective House God to the Antichrist

Bibliographic Data

ID12304288
AuthorsH J R Lenders (0000-0002-9306-5537, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Ingo A W Janssen (RAVON foundation (Reptile, Amphibian and Fish Conservation Netherlands), Nijmegen/Amsterdam University of Amsterdam Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) Sciencepark 904 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Year2014
Volume20
Issue3
Pages319-346
Publication date2014-06-25
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0967-3407 • E-ISSN: 1752-7023
PublisherLiverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3197/096734014x14031694156367
OpenAlexW2129666271
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

The grass snake owes its far northern distribution in Europe to the production and hoarding of dung from stock breeding. Dung heaps appear to be perfect breeding sites that surpass 'natural' reproduction sites in quality. Here we point out that the grass snake's dependency on manure goes back to Neolithic times and that it had a reciprocal cultural effect. Moreover, the positive influence of humans on the species not only resulted from physical opportunities offered by agriculture, but also from the fact that grass snakes were considered to be chthonic deities not to be harmed. The conversion of Europe to Christianity, however, marked the turning of the cultural tide for the species. From being a divine creature originally, the grass snake evolved into the number one symbol of the Anti-Christ: the basilisk. In spite of the subsequent witch-hunt motivated by Christian belief, the overall historical human influence on the species was certainly not detrimental as regarded geographical distribution opportunities. This historical perspective on grass snake-human relationships adds to the discussion of whether nature conservation is better served by a strategy of land sparing or of land sharing. It also makes clear not only that co-dependency of species is a matter of mutual biophysical advantages but that metaphysical considerations may also play a role. In this case it leads to the conclusion that bringing back the grass snake into our direct everyday surroundings is both favourable to the grass snake and reinstates the species in our own cultural environment

Biology · Environmental ethics · Ethnology · Geography · Symbol (formal · Animal and Plant Science Education · History · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Philosophy · Plant and animal studies · Ecology

  • A 2 400-year-old terracotta Javelin sand boa Eryx jaculus (Linnaeus, 1758)

    Open Access•Apostolos Christopoulos, Taxiarchis Danelis•Anthropozoologica•2026

  • Towards a multimodal ethnohistorical approach

    Lauren O’hagan, Lauren O’ Hagan•Social Semiotics•2018

  • Animals in Roman life and art

    J M C Toynbee•Animals in Roman life and art•1973

  • Bones and Eggs. The Archaeological Presence of the Grass Snake Natrix natrix (L.) in The Netherlands

    Louise H van Wijngaarden-Bakker, Kees D Troostheide•Environmental Archaeology•2003

  • The Basilisk and Rattlesnake, or a European Monster Comes to America

    Boria Sax•Society and Animals•1994

  • Some archaeoherpetological remains from the Netherlands

    Open Access•Rob Glastra•Journal of Archaeological Science•1983

  • Pliny the Elder

    Chester F Natunewicz, John F Healy•The Classical World•1993

  • European Witch Trials

    Open Access•Lucy Mair, Richard Kieckhefer•RAIN•1976

  • European Witch Trials

    Venetia Newall, Richard Kieckhefer•Man•1976

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae