Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ecological Effects of Forest Tenure Reform in Southern China

An Institutional Change Perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID12308265
AuthorsChen Liang (0000-0002-8444-8050, School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Renmin University of China Beijing China), Shenwei Wan (0009-0000-1962-6132, School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Renmin University of China Beijing China), Yang Zhou (0000-0002-4537-9857, School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Renmin University of China Beijing China), Shuifa Ke (0009-0008-0093-3472, School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Renmin University of China Beijing China, corresponding author), Yiming He (0000-0002-9623-4658, School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development Renmin University of China Beijing China)
Year2025
Volume33
Issue5
Pages7005-7024
Publication date2025-04-29
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainable Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sd.3508
OpenAlexW4409975054
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited61

The forest tenure reform plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of forest areas. It secures people's livelihoods and fosters the continuous growth of forest resources, generating substantial ecological effects. However, a systematic evaluation of the ecological effects of forest tenure reform remains absent. Here, we utilize remote sensing data from forest areas in southern China spanning 1998–2022 and employ a staggered Difference‐in‐Differences (DID) alongside an event study model to assess the ecological effects of forest tenure reform. Specifically, we examine the effects of the devolution of forest tenure reform (DFTR) and the improvement of forest tenure reform (IFTR). Our findings reveal that DFTR significantly promoted the short‐term recovery of forest ecosystems. During the IFTR stage, forest ecological benefits have been effectively maintained through policies that harmonize private interests, economic factors, and ecological considerations. Mechanism analysis indicates that changes in the forest tenure system have shifted the focus of forest management from timber production toward multifunctional uses, including ecological conservation, recreational services, and understory cultivation. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that during the DFTR stage, counties in important river basins and with high levels of agricultural mechanization experienced stronger ecological impacts from the policy. In contrast, these regions exhibited significant negative effects in the IFTR stage. To address these challenges, future policy reforms should prioritize scientific adjustments to the utilization of ecological public welfare forests, expansion of forest ecosystem payment mechanisms, development of innovative forestry technology services, and the promotion of large‐scale forestry management. Our findings provide valuable insights for further advancing forest tenure reform

Biology · China · Economics · Geography · Institutional change · Natural resource economics · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Public Administration · Ecology

  • What influences the effectiveness of forest conservation interventions in tropical regions? A systematic review

    Open Access•Cauê Dias Carrilho, Colas Chervier et al.•Ecological Economics•2026

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•1990

  • A harmonized global nighttime light dataset 1992–2018

    Open Access•Xuecao Li, Yuyu Zhou et al.•Scientific Data•2020

  • Revisiting the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром et al.•Science•1999

  • Ownership Risk, Investment, and the Use of Natural Resources

    Henning Bohn, Robert T Deacon•American Economic Review•2000

  • Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

    Clément de Chaisemartin, Xavier D’Haultfœuille•American Economic Review•2020

  • A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Science•2009

  • Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing

    Open Access•Andrew Goodman-Bacon•Journal of Econometrics•2021

  • A global review of the impact of forest property rights interventions on poverty

    Open Access•D C Miller, Pushpendra Rana et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • Development opportunities, forest use transition, and farmers' income differentiation

    Open Access•Yi Li, Peichen Gong et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Influence of land tenure interventions on human well-being and environmental outcomes

    Open Access•Tzu-Wei Joy Tseng, Brian Robinson et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • China's second round of forest reforms

    Open Access•Jintao Xu, William F Hyde•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • China's forest expansion in the last three plus decades

    Open Access•Daowei Zhang•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Impact of property rights reform on household forest management investment

    Yi Xie, Yali Wen et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2013

  • Whereabouts devolution and collective forest management

    Open Access•William F Hyde•Forest Policy and Economics•2016

  • Years of China's forest reforms

    Open Access•William F Hyde, Runsheng Yin•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Devolution of tenure rights in forestland in China

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Yi•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • What is forest tenure (in)security? Insights from participatory perspective analysis

    Open Access•Allan Larson, A M Larson et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2022

  • Passive or not? – Examining the diversity within passive forest owners

    Open Access•Anne Matilainen, Merja Lähdesmäki•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • Forest tenure and the Sustainable Development Goals – A critical view

    Open Access•Pia Katila, Constance L Mcdermott et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Broadening the scope of forest transition inquiry

    Open Access•Shuifa Ke, Dan Qiao et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • Coordinating forest tenure reform

    Open Access•Rodd Myers, Micah R Fisher et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2022

  • The evolution and impact of timber markets in China's southern collective forest region

    Open Access•Lanying Li, Gang Lu et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • The role of affluence, urbanization, and human capital for sustainable forest management in China

    Open Access•Veli Yilanci, Recep Ulucak et al.•Sustainable Development•2022

  • Smile even if your burdens are heavy”

    Open Access•Tham Mun Hou, Pramila Tamunaidu et al.•Sustainable Development•2024

  • State, forest and community

    Open Access•Henri‐Noël Bouda, Patrice Savadogo et al.•Sustainable Development•2009

  • Beyond environmental sustainability

    Open Access•Ke Liu, Peng Cheng et al.•Sustainable Development•2024

  • Complexities of sustainable palm oil production by smallholders in sub‐Saharan Africa

    Open Access•L M Ayompe, Raymond N Nkongho et al.•Sustainable Development•2023

  • Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries

    Open Access•Jack Baynes, John Herbohn et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Indigenous Lands with secure land-tenure can reduce forest-loss in deforestation hotspots

    Open Access•M Camino, P Aceves et al.•Global Environmental Change•2023

  • The role of protected areas and land tenure regimes on forest loss in Bolivia

    Open Access•Boillat, Michele Graziano Ceddia et al.•Global Environmental Change•2022

  • Wage Growth, Landholding, and Mechanization in Chinese Agriculture

    Open Access•Xiaobing Wang, Futoshi Yamauchi et al.•World Development•2016

  • Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources

    Open Access•Arun Agrawal•World Development•2001

  • Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures

    Open Access•Awudu Abdulai, Victor Owusu et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2010

  • China's forest tenure reform and institutional change in the new century

    Open Access•Runsheng Yin, Shunbo Yao et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Has China’s new round of collective forest reforms caused an increase in the use of productive forest inputs

    Open Access•Can Liu, Hao Liu et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Factors influencing land fractioning in the context of land market deregulation in Ecuador

    Open Access•Fabián Reyes-Bueno, Fabián Reyes‐bueno et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Toward a tenure-responsive approach to forest landscape restoration

    Open Access•R Mclain, Steven Lawry et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • The forest transition

    Open Access•E B Barbier, Joanne C Burgess et al.•Land Use Policy•2010

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae