Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Economic–Social Performance Relationships of Ports

Roles of Stakeholders and Organizational Tension

Bibliographic Data

ID12308340
AuthorsSangHyun Cheon (Hongik University Department of Urban Planning and Design Seoul South Korea, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume25
Issue1
Pages50-62
Publication date2016-03-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainable Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sd.1641
OpenAlexW2325290463
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited39

This study examines the mechanisms that shape relationships between port economic and social performance. Based on the concepts of organizational paradox and stakeholder heterogeneity, the study develops a paradox–stakeholder combination matrix to explain context‐ and issue‐specific economic–social performance relationships. Differing economic–social performance links may vary with different stakeholders' roles in relation to ports' sustainable development issues. The empirical evidence from US ports provides crucial implications for quasi‐public organizations, which face complex organizational identities. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Business · Context (archaeology · Empirical evidence · Face (sociological concept · Knowledge management · Organizational performance · Political science · Public relations · Relation (database · Social science · Sociology · Stakeholder · Computer Science · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Marketing

  • Based on stakeholder questionnaires of ship-derived waste, waste management re-planning in Ports and determining the need for inspection

    Open Access•Ömer Harun Özkaynak, Gönül Tuğrul İçemer•Marine Policy•2024

  • Twenty years of sustainable development and port authorities

    Open Access•Fernando Gonzalez-Laxe, Fernando González Laxe et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • The Power to Change

    Open Access•Eini Haaja, Olga Dziubaniuk et al.•Sustainable Development•2026

  • Port Authority of Cartagena

    Open Access•Carlos Suárez‐Gargallo, Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez et al.•Sustainable Development•2023

  • The Consequences of Integrating Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Development (Environmental Perspectives)

    Open Access•Milad Abdelnabi Salem, Fekri Ali Shawtari et al.•Sustainable Development•2017

  • Analysing sustainability changes in seaports

    Open Access•Rodrigo Lozano, Lea Fobbe et al.•Sustainable Development•2018

  • Ranking measures to improve the sustainability of Mediterranean ports based on multicriteria decision analysis

    Open Access•Ioannis Argyriou, Nikolaos Sifakis et al.•Environment Development and…•2022

  • Adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system approach for urban sustainability assessment

    Open Access•Yongtao Tan, Chenyang Shuai et al.•Sustainable Development•2018

  • Towards sustainability in the port sector

    Open Access•Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan, Lillian Hansen et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2021

  • The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship

    Open Access•Lee E Preston, Douglas P O'Bannon•Business & Society•1997

  • Measuring Corporate Social Performance

    Open Access•Donna J Wood•International Journal of…•2010

  • Business Ethics

    Open Access•Charles J Fombrun, Charles Fombrun et al.•Corporate Reputation Review•2004

  • Does it pay to be really good? addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance

    Open Access•Michael L Barnett, Robert Salomon et al.•Strategic Management Journal•2012

  • A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm

    Stuart L Hart•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models

    Léopold Simar, Paul W Wilson•Journal of Applied Statistics•2000

  • A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance

    Max B E Clarkson•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • Measuring the efficiency of decision making units

    Open Access•A Charnes, W W Cooper et al.•European Journal of Operational…•1978

  • Emergent eco‐efficiency paradigm in corporate environment management

    Open Access•Jukka Hoffrén, Eeva-Lotta Apajalahti et al.•Sustainable Development•2008

  • Stakeholder relations and financial performance

    Open Access•Ben Scholten, Yangqin Zhou•Sustainable Development•2008

  • A data envelopment analysis approach to the assessment of natural parks' economic efficiency and sustainability. The case of Italian national parks

    Open Access•Valentina Bosetti, Gianni Locatelli•Sustainable Development•2006

  • The Demands of Conflicting Change on Public Enterprise

    Herman L Boschken•Public Administration Review•1982

  • Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship

    Open Access•Michael E Porter, Claas Van Der Linde•The Journal of Economic…•1995

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae