Remittances, Health Financing Systems, and SDG Three Outcomes in Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12308489 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yuyue Chen (0009-0008-9402-6477, College of Marxism Studies, Yangzhou University Yangzhou China), Kazeem B Ajide (0000-0001-6363-9483, Department of Economics University of Lagos Lagos Nigeria, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainable Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0968-0802 • E-ISSN: 1099-1719 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sd.70874 |
| OpenAlex | W7135370627 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 26 |
Africa continues to face persistent challenges in achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3), despite expanded health initiatives and renewed global commitments. At the same time, remittances have become one of the continent's most stable external financial inflows, often exceeding foreign aid and foreign direct investment. Yet the extent to which these private transfers improve population health remains uncertain, especially in health‐financing systems characterized by underfunding, fragmentation, and high out‐of‐pocket burdens. This study examines how remittances interact with national health‐financing structures to influence SDG 3 outcomes across 48 African countries from 2000 to 2022. Using a multidimensional Health Financing Capacity Index and applying second‐generation estimators—Cross‐Sectional ARDL (CS–ARDL), Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCEMG), and Augmented Mean Group (AMG)—the analysis reveals three main findings. First, remittances have a positive but modest direct effect on SDG 3 performance. Second, structural financing indicators, particularly, government health spending and financial protection, are the strongest long‐run determinants of health outcomes. Third, interaction models show that remittances yield greater health benefits in weak or high–out‐of‐pocket systems, while their marginal impact declines in stronger financing environments. Overall, the results indicate that remittances cannot substitute for robust and sustainable health‐financing frameworks. Their developmental value depends on the institutional capacity of national systems to convert household transfers into effective health gains. The study offers new evidence to guide integrated SDG financing strategies that align private remittances with structural reforms in Africa's health sector
Government (linguistics · Health care · Health spending · Population · Population health · Private sector · Sustainable development · Value (mathematics · Yield (engineering · Economic Growth and Development · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · International Development and Aid
Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs
Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels
Are Remittances Insurance? Evidence from Rainfall Shocks in the Philippines
Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors
Protecting Households From Catastrophic Health Spending
A Simple Test for Cointegration in Dependent Panels with Structural Breaks
Risk and Insurance in Village India
Adult Child Migration and the Health of Elderly Parents Left Behind in Mexico
Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure
Causes of maternal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa
Migration and Economic Mobility in Tanzania
Maternal Mortality in Africa
Do international migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries
Africa and the Clean Development Mechanism
The prospects of creating ‘fiscal space’ for the health sector
Migradollars and mortality
Motivations to Remit
On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health
State-Led Land Reform and Local Institutional Change
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |