Explosive Missals’

International Law, Technology, and Security in Nineteenth-Century Disarmament Conferences

Bibliographic Data

ID12309131
AuthorsScott Andrew Keefer (0000-0003-3572-5522, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author), Scott Keefer (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Year2014
Volume21
Issue4
Pages445-464
Publication date2014-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueWar in History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0968-3445 • E-ISSN: 1477-0385
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0968344513505810
OpenAlexW2077499209
LanguageEN
Citations received11

This article challenges traditional interpretations of the 1868 Declaration of St Petersburg banning explosive bullets and the 1899 Hague Declaration forbidding expanding bullets as humanitarian agreements. A review of the legal terms of these arms control agreements and diplomatic correspondence provides evidence that Britain sought to harness advanced technology to overcome manpower deficiencies in imperial and European warfare. In 1868 Britain wanted to avoid restrictions on the employment of advanced technology in imperial wars, while at the Hague Peace Conference in 1899 a similar rationale was advanced to mask a desire to use advanced technology in European wars

Arms control · Declaration · Disarmament · Political science · History · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Military History and Strategy · War, Ethics, and Justification

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub