The current status of disability activism and non‐governmental organizations in post‐communist Europe
Preliminary findings based on reports from the field
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12314083 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Holland (0000-0002-0228-8031, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 543-555 |
| Publication date | 2008-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Disability & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0968-7599 • E-ISSN: 1360-0508 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09687590802328337 |
| OpenAlex | W1964761784 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 11 |
The purpose of this study was to conduct qualitative research on the disability rights and independent living movement in post‐communist Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Specifically, the research focused on the Visegrad Four countries of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland and Hungary. Field research involving key informant interviews with 17 disability activists and non‐governmental organization (NGO) leaders was conducted. Interviews consisted of an open method of inquiry with the key informants. Extensive analysis of transcripts is ongoing, but the urgent need for international reporting on disability issues, particularly regarding regions undergoing a great deal of political transition and civil society development, necessitates a preliminary report on this research at this time. Preliminary findings suggest the following. (1) Disability activism and NGO leadership in the Visegrad Four countries has, with a few exceptions, favored a consensus‐based approach to development, with emphases on service provision rather than disability rights. (2) Entry into the European Union (EU) has resulted in more explicit policies concerning disability rights, but has brought only limited changes in practical terms for citizens with disabilities due to a lack of implementation methods on the part of the state, lack of an emphasis on disability rights on the part of most NGOs and few consequences for those who transgress stated policies. (3) While some changes have occurred with regard to the physical conditions of institutional settings, little has changed across the Visegrad Four countries with regards to commitment, guardianship and involuntary treatment procedures, resulting in a continued problem of individuals with disabilities (particularly mental disabilities) losing independence and personal sovereignty as a result of receiving treatment. It is tentatively concluded that North American and EU agencies and international NGOs forming partnerships with disability organizations in the Visegrad Four countries need to recognize the strong trend towards consensus rather than conflict models for advancement in disability issues. International assistance in the provision of resources, consultation and capacity building is imperative if disability rights and independent living is to advance at a desired rate in the Visegrad Four countries
Business · Civil society · Communism · Communist state · Czech · Economic growth · European union · Human rights · Legal guardian · Political science · Politics · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Law · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
EU Social Inclusion Policies in Post-Socialist Countries
Why can’t children with autism integrate into society in China? Study based on the perspective of NGO classification
Pushed to the Edge? Entrepreneurs with Disabilities and the Post-socialist Experience of Ableism
Civil Society, Rights and Welfare
So They’ll Have Somewhere to Go”
Postsocialist disability matrix
Change without Change
Rethinking “Transition” in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union Through the Lens of Disability
Critique of deinstitutionalisation in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe
Almost Equal
From State Socialist to Neoliberal Productivism
Assessing disability rights in four Asian countries
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |