Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contested Grounds and Missing Sticks

Assessing the Legality of India’s Surgical Strikes in Pakistan

Bibliographic Data

ID12323137
AuthorsNabarun Roy (0009-0002-6819-8423, Nabarun Roy is an assistant professor in the Department of International Relations at the South Asian University, New Delhi. He obtained his PhD from the Department of Political Science, Carleton University, Ottawa. His research focuses on theories of international relations, wars, great power politics, geopolitics of South Asia and Indian foreign policy., corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume80
Issue4
Pages481-502
Publication date2024-10-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIndia Quarterly A Journal of International Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0974-9284 • E-ISSN: 0975-2684
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/09749284241285070
OpenAlexW4403365469
LanguageEN
References cited25

The article wades into the contested issue of the legality of India’s surgical strikes in Pakistan in the last decade. While legal scholars have deliberated on the legality of India’s actions, international relations (IR) have remained silent, thereby underlining the chasm between IR and international law when it comes to international issues. This article evaluates the competing claims made by legal scholars by engaging with developments in international law pertaining to the use of force as an ‘outsider’ approaching the issue from a fresh vantage point. It finds the argument regarding the weakness of India’s legal position to be more convincing. However,it does not fully subscribe to the reasons attributed for the weakness. Drawing on insights from IR, it highlights the salience of political considerations and incentive structures. The article argues that a comprehensive view that includes legal and political dimensions needs to be taken to appreciate India’s stand regarding the surgical strikes

Development economics · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Principle of legality · Sociology · Employment and Welfare Studies · Global Security and Public Health · Health and Conflict Studies · Law

  • After Victory

    G John Ikenberry, G John John Ikenberry•After Victory•2001

  • Política entre las naciones

    Hans Morgenthau•Política entre las naciones•2020

  • Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law

    James Crawford•Brownlies Principles Of Public…•2012

  • The Realism Reader

    Michael A Jensen, Colin Elman et al.•Realism Reader•2014

  • On the History and Historiography of International Relations

    Brian C Schmidt, Brian Schmidt•Handbook of International Relations•2002

  • A Means of First Resort

    Lionel Beehner, Lionel M Beehner•Security Studies•2018

  • The ‘Unwilling or Unable’ Test

    Open Access•Olivier Corten•Leiden Journal of International Law•2016

  • Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors

    Open Access•Jutta Brunnée, Stephen J Toope•International and Comparative Law…•2018

  • Who Killed Article 2(4)? or

    Open Access•Thomas M Franck•American Journal of International…•1970

  • Power and International Law

    Open Access•Richard H Steinberg, Jonathan M Zasloff•American Journal of International…•2006

  • Theory of international politics

    Kenneth Neal Waltz•Theory of international politics•1979

  • United Nations use of military force

    Open Access•Inis L Claude•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1963

  • TWAIL and the "Unwilling or Unable" Doctrine

    Open Access•Ntina Tzouvala•AJIL Unbound•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae