Le transnational et le national dans la formation de la classe capitaliste

Capital originated in between the political jurisdictions of the late Middle Ages and came of age in the English-speaking West. The British Isles and North America offered a liberal space which proved most congenial to the circulation of capital. By the late 17th century it occupied the high ground in the global political economy. Rival states, beginning with France, sought to match the advantage of the English-speaking West, by way of state-led development. Such contender states must confiscate and nationalize their societies, in order to mobilize resources for the contest with the Lockean heartland, thus exposing themselves to a passive revolution in which liberalism slowly undermines the power of the state class. A liberal state/society thus develops under the auspices of alternating fractions of capital, which must also build national compromises, as with labour in the post-war period, and with asset-owning middle classes in a conjuncture where a formerly globalizing production is replaced by money capital as the dominant force. Contemporary capitalist society is losing the ability to forge such compromises, as oligarchic capital resorts more and more to authoritarianism and war

Ancient history · Authoritarianism · Capital (architecture · CONTEST · Democracy · Economic history · Economics · Liberalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · State (computer science · History · Law · Political Economy and Marxism

• Estado E Capital Em Uma China Com Classes

  Open Access•Ilza Nogueira, Isabela Nogueira•Revista de Economia Contemporânea•2018

  Add to list