Discourse on Damage
The Debate Continues
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12330110 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ann E Mayne (corresponding author), Ann Mayne, Anne Mayne |
| Year | 1993 |
| Issue | 16 |
| Pages | 19-19 |
| Publication date | 1993-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Agenda (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1013-0950 • E-ISSN: 2158-978X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/4065554 |
| OpenAlex | W1587361021 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 2 |
I found the debate between Ann Levett and Diana Russell (Agenda 10, 11, 12) very interesting. As a survivor I was very disturbed by Ann Levett's article and did not feel that it validated my experience or strengthened the struggle against violence against women and children. On the other hand, I liked Diana Russell's critique very much, but there was much I did not understand about the debate, ie Ann Levett's political framework. Having worked with Rape Crisis Cape Town for 13 years, I wanted to contribute something to the debate but did not know how. So I sought out Liz Kelly, a leading British feminist academic, researcher and activist, and the following is a transcript of our discussion
Epistemology · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Homelessness and Social Issues · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.09 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1993 - 2001 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |