Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Terrorism, Torture, and Refugee Protection in the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID12334686
AuthorsMaryellen Fullerton (Brooklyn Law School, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume29
Issue4
Pages4-30
Publication date2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRefugee Survey Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1020-4067 • E-ISSN: 1471-695X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/rsq/hdq040
OpenAlexW2327522746
LanguageEN
Citations received2

In recent years the United States Congress has enacted multiple anti-terrorism laws in its efforts to exclude from the country terrorists and those who associate with terrorists or provide them material support. The anti-terrorism provisions, particularly the material support bar, prevent many individuals with a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group from receiving asylum or protection from refoulement. These statutes deny protection to refugees even though there are no reasonable grounds to consider them dangers to the security of the United States, and, accordingly, these legislative provisions violate international refugee law. In apparent recognition that applying the anti-terrorism bars can lead to unjust and illegal results, Executive Branch officials have issued a series of ad hoc waivers of the material support bar. These waivers, though beneficial to the individuals who successfully navigate the waiver procedures, are insufficient to bring the United States into compliance with international refugee law. Another avenue of protection, the non-refoulement obligation of the Convention Against Torture, has also been utilized when the material support bar has threatened to deprive refugees and asylum-seekers of protection under the Refugee Convention and Protocol. This is a welcome outcome for the sub-group of refugees and asylum-seekers who fall within its scope, but the Convention Against Torture also falls far short of affording all asylum-seekers and refugees the non-refoulement protection guaranteed by the Refugee Convention. Without new legislation, such as the proposed 2010 Refugee Protection Act, U.S. anti-terrorism statutes will remain in violation of international refugee law

Comprehensive Plan of Action · Convention · Criminology · Human rights · International law · Political science · Refugee · Refugee law · Sociology · Statute · Terrorism · Torture · Waiver · International Law and Aviation · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Law

  • Refugee Resettlement

    Joanne Van Selm•Oxford Handbook of Refugee and…•2014

  • Helping hands

    J H Brouwer, Jelmer Brouwer et al.•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2013

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,15
Citation span2013 - 2014 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae