Created and Limited by Politics
A view of the ICC from Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12338485 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shadrack B O Gutto (University of South Africa, corresponding author), SHADRACK GUTTO |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 127-128 |
| Publication date | 2003-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | African Security Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1024-6029 • E-ISSN: 2154-0128 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10246029.2003.9627258 |
| OpenAlex | W1533047230 |
| Language | EN |
Extracted from text ... The adoption of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 1998 marked an historic achievement for humanity. The entry into force of the Statute in 2002 and the election of the judges and appointment of the Prosecutor and the Registrar in 2003 were quick by comparison to previous behaviour of states in such serious matters. For the first time in history a truly international criminal judicial institution has been established. The gap created by the fact that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was given a limited mandate to interpret the UN Charter and to adjudicate
Adjudication · Charter · Crimes against humanity · Criminal court · Economic Justice · Humanity · Institution · International court · International law · Mandate · Political science · Politics · Public international law · Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court · Statute · Statute of limitations · War crime · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|