Deleuze and literature
Metaphor and indirect discourse
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12346207 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Marks (0000-0002-4959-5776, Loughborough University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 233-246 |
| Publication date | 1997-08-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Semiotics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1035-0330 • E-ISSN: 1470-1219 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10350339709360383 |
| OpenAlex | W2031657595 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 4 |
This paper deals primarily with Deleuze's work on literature? but also looks briefly at related ideas in the books on cinema. Deleuze has often concentrated on what he calls ‘American‘ literature, particularly in Critique and clinlque. The first part of the paper seeks to outline some of the main elements of this particular literary field for Deleuze. The paper then goes on to show how the general rejection of metaphor that informs Deleuze's work on literature can be more precisely defined as a theory of free indirect discourse. The concept of free indirect discourse is? as Frangois Zourabichvili has shown, at the heart of Deleuze's work? aesthetic or otherwise. For example, the idea of the percept functions as an aesthetic application of free indirect discourse, and Cinema 1 and Cinema 2 suggest that this form of enunciation represents a new aesthetic cogito to which cinema is ideally suited
Aesthetics · Art · Cityscape · Cogito ergo sum · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Linguistics · Literature · Metaphor · Movie theater · Sociology · Visual arts · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · French Literature and Critical Theory · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.36 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2020 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |