Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Stagecraft of New Zealand Evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID12347237
AuthorsNeil Lunt (0000-0002-4501-1999, Massey University, corresponding author), Neil T Lunt (Social Policy at Massey University at Albany, Auckland), Ian G Trotman (The State Services Commission)
Year2005
Volume5
Issue1
Pages3-10
Publication date2005-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEvaluation Journal of Australasia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1035-719X • E-ISSN: 2515-9372
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1035719x0500500102
OpenAlexW2761694033
LanguageEN
References cited2

Since the 1960s there has been a growing interest in evaluation shown by most Western countries. Alongside discussion of practical and theoretical issues of evaluation, such as methodological developments, best practice, and cross-cultural practice, there has also been increased interest in mapping the history of evaluation activity. Historical discussions are significant for three reasons; first, in providing a record for future generations of evaluators. Second, they provide a consideration of the domestic and international context that has shaped evaluation development, giving each country its distinct institutional make-up and brand of evaluation activity. Third, they assist a country's evaluation capacity development by building on its strengths and compensating for the weaknesses of its history. This article traces the emergence of evaluation within New Zealand using the metaphor of dramaturgy to introduce the settings and actors that we consider to have been constituent of what was played out in the New Zealand situation. Our remit is a broad one of attempting to describe and explain the range of evaluation activities, including program evaluation, organisational review, performance management, and process and policy evaluation. Within this article a broad overview only is possible. As an example of a more in-depth study, a comprehensive article could be prepared on the history of performance management in the public service. Our comments cover developments in the public sector, tertiary sector, and private and professional organisations. It is a companion paper to one on the history of evaluation in Australia, prepared by Colin A Sharp in a recent issue of this journal (Sharpe 2003)

Aesthetics · Context (archaeology · Dramaturgy · Metaphor · Political science · Private sector · Process (computing · Public relations · Public sector · Sociology · Strengths and weaknesses · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · History · Law · Psychology

  • Development of program evaluation in Australia and the Australasian Evaluation Society – the early decades

    Open Access•Colin A Sharp•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2003

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae