Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gamified, Flexible, and Creative Tools for Evaluating a Support Program for Palliative Children and Their Families

Bibliographic Data

ID12347331
AuthorsErika Fortunati (0000-0002-0959-0049, Research and Evaluation, Starlight Children’s Foundation Australia, corresponding author), Claire Treadgold (0000-0001-7530-3645, Research and Evaluation, Starlight Children’s Foundation Australia)
Year2025
Publication date2025-12-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEvaluation Journal of Australasia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1035-719X • E-ISSN: 2515-9372
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1035719x251407737
OpenAlexW7116980675
LanguageEN
References cited22

This article explores the innovative evaluation methods developed for Starlight Children’s Foundation’s palliative care program, Moments . This approach focuses on capturing feedback from children and families in a flexible, creative manner while minimising evaluation burden. A review of the literature revealed an absence of standardised tools for evaluating programs in palliative care, especially those involving children. However, research shows that participatory and child-friendly evaluation techniques enhance engagement and provide valuable insights into program impact, amplifying children’s voices in a context where they are often underrepresented. In response, Starlight developed novel gamified evaluation activity books and worksheets tailored to various developmental stages, enabling children to share their feedback in a playful, meaningful way that aligns with the program’s nature. Based on our work, we recommend (a) using gamified and participatory methods that actively involve children; (b) creating multiple formats suited to different ages using plain language; (c) applying opt-in recruitment while being mindful of timing; (d) offering clear, flexible participation options such as explainer videos and both digital and physical submissions; and (e) maintaining rigorous ethical standards. These findings add to broader research on program evaluation and highlight the importance of prioritising children’s perspectives, even in sensitive care contexts

Citizen journalism · Context (archaeology · Palliative care · Participatory action research · Participatory evaluation · Program evaluation · Starlight · Child Therapy and Development · Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life · Pediatric Pain Management Techniques

  • Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people

    Open Access•Gina Sherwood, Parson•Research Ethics•2021

  • Research with young children

    Open Access•Imelda Coyne, Deirdre Mallon et al.•Children & Society•2021

  • My mind is not in my brain”

    Open Access•Donna M Thomas, Zoe O’Riordan•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2024

  • Photovoice

    Open Access•Natalie Seed•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2016

  • A methodological reflection on investigating children’s voice in qualitative research involving children with severe speech and physical impairments

    Open Access•Seray Ibrahim, Asimina Vasalou et al.•Disability & Society•2021

  • Children's voices for change

    Open Access•Georgina Dimopoulos, Kirra Horley et al.•Childhood•2024

  • Too Vulnerable to Participate? Challenges for Meaningful Participation in Research With Children in Alternative Care and Adoption

    Open Access•Manuela Garcia-Quiroga, Irene Salvo Agoglia•International Journal of…•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae