Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

High Court review 2003

The centenary year

Bibliographic Data

ID12351198
AuthorsKatharine Gelber (0000-0002-0239-3552, a University of New South Wales, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume39
Issue2
Pages331-347
Publication date2004-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1036114042000238546
OpenAlexW2052672751
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited8

2003 marked the Centenary year of the High Court, an anniversary which provides an opportunity to revisit debates about its role in the Australian system of government. The first section of this article canvasses debates around this question, culminating in a consideration of the High Court's ‘new politics’. This sets the framework for an examination of events in 2003 from the perspective of the interaction between the judicial and other branches of government, in particular the executive. The article analyses the implications of executive interventions in relation to the judiciary, as well as important cases brought before the High Court. It argues that conflict between the executive and judicial branches is only likely to increase where contradictions of purpose arise between international legal norms and obligations, the rule of law and domestic policy objectives. This article is the third in a series of reviews of the High Court from a political‐science perspective published in the Australian Journal of Political Science

Executive branch · Government (linguistics · High Court · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Relation (database · Section (typography · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • High Court Review 2010

    Anika Gauja, Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2011

  • High court review 2005

    Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2006

  • High Court Review 2009

    Anika Gauja•Australian Journal of Political…•2010

  • High Court Review 2004

    Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2005

  • The High Court of Australia and political science

    Ryan Turner, Ryan James Turner•Australian Journal of Political…•2015

  • The role of attitudinal, institutional and environmental factors in explaining variations in the dissent rate on the High Court of Australia

    Russell Smyth•Australian Journal of Political…•2005

  • Friends or Foes? The Commonwealth and the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in the Courts

    Rhonda Evans Case•Australian Journal of Political…•2009

  • A Federal Republic

    Open Access•Brian Galligan•Federal Republic•1995

  • Explaining historical dissent rates in the high court of Australia

    Russell Smyth•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2003

  • Pedestrian Malls, Local Government and Free Speech Policy in Australia

    Open Access•Katharine Gelber•Policy and Society•2003

  • A fair queue? Australian public discourse on refugees and immigration

    Katharine Gelber•Journal of Australian Studies•2003

  • High Court Review 2002

    Haig Patapan•Australian Journal of Political…•2003

  • Separation of Powers in Australia

    Haig Patapan•Australian Journal of Political…•1999

  • The Western Australian Election of 10 February 2001

    David R Black, David Black et al.•Australian Journal of Political…•2001

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2005 - 2015 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae